• J-F Muir, B Lamia, C Molano, P-L Declercq, and A Cuvelier.
• UPRES EA 3830, unité de soins intensifs respiratoires, service de pneumologie, institut hospitalo-universitaire de recherche biomédicale et d'innovation, université de Rouen, CHU de Rouen, 76031 Rouen cedex, France. Jean-Francois.Muir@chu-rouen.fr
• Rev Mal Respir. 2012 Oct 1; 29 (8): 994-1006.

IntroductionAt a time when non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly used in acute as well as chronic respiratory failure, it is important to consider the current place, if any, of long-term tracheostomy.BackgroundExcept in emergency situations where tracheostomy is mandatory to ensure safe access to the airway, long-term ventilation with tracheostomy (LTVT) is generally considered in the case of inability to wean from NIV after an episode of acute respiratory failure requiring endotracheal ventilation or because of the development of bulbar signs (swallowing, phonation) in advanced neuromuscular disease. It is also appropriate when ventilatory dependence on NIV exceeds 20 hours per day. Historical retrospective studies confirmed the feasibility of LTVT, but this has to be seen in perspective with the results obtained 20 years later with NIV.Viewpoint And ConclusionEven if the indications for LTVT have diminished considerably since the emergence of NIV, tracheostomy remains mandatory in some situations of respiratory distress and it should be considered as a potential resource, possibly temporary in some cases in the light of recent work on the possibility of decanulation after LTVT.Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

21 keywords...

hide…