• Timothy D Jackson, Fady Saleh, Fayez A Quereshy, Sanjeev Sockalingam, David Urbach, and Allan Okrainec.
• Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Bariatric Surgery Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Timothy.Jackson@uhn.ca.
• Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov 1; 10 (6): 1110-5.

BackgroundLaparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) insertion is a commonly performed bariatric procedure with low associated short-term risk. Given that a significant number of patients will require additional revision/removal procedures, overall morbidity may be underestimated. The objective of this study was to define the 30-day morbidity associated with LAGB removal and revision procedures.MethodsPatients undergoing revision or removal of LAGB were identified within The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) participant use file using current procedural terminology and ICD-9 coding. Patients having concurrent procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes included 30-day morbidity. The rate of complications in the removal/revision patients versus primary LAGB insertion was compared. We also analyzed trends over time.ResultsA total of 3,236 patients underwent LAGB removal (n = 1,580), revision (n = 1,111) or port site revision (n = 545) from 2006-2011. The overall 30-day complication rate was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8%, 6.4%) and was higher in patients undergoing LAGB removal with a 6.8% (95% CI: 5.6%, 8.1%) adverse event rate (2.5% infectious, 2.3% wound, 2.4% reoperation). A total of 24,438 patients underwent primary LAGB insertion within the data set with a 30-day complication rate of 2.6% (95% CI: 2.4%, 2.8%). Patients undergoing LABG removal had a significantly higher complication rate than those having primary LAGB insertion with an odds ratio of 2.72 (95% CI: 2.18, 3.37). The proportion of LAGB revision/removal compared to primary placement increased annually over the study period (P for trend<.001).ConclusionThe 30-day morbidity associated with LAGB revision is significant and higher than that associated with primary LAGB insertions. The potential need for future procedures and the associated additional morbidity should be considered when evaluating LAGB as a treatment option for morbid obesity.Copyright © 2014 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

43 keywords...

hide…