• Journal of neurotrauma · Feb 2005

    The assessment of locomotor function in spinal cord injured rats: the importance of objective analysis of coordination.

    • Guido C Koopmans, Ronald Deumens, Wiel M M Honig, Frank P T Hamers, Harry W M Steinbusch, and Elbert A J Joosten.
    • Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Division Neuroscience, European Graduate School of Neuroscience EURON, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. g.koopmans@np.unimaas.nl
    • J. Neurotrauma. 2005 Feb 1; 22 (2): 214-25.

    AbstractThe Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale is the most widely used open field test and has been accepted as a valid way to assess locomotor function after spinal cord contusion injury in the rat. A limitation within the BBB locomotor rating scale is the correct assessment of forelimb (FL)-hindlimb (HL) coordination. This limitation can have major implications for the final assessment of locomotor function. In the present study, we show an objective method to assess coordination based on the regularity index (RI), achieved through the use of the CatWalk method. The RI grades the degree of coordination as the result of the number of normal step sequence patterns multiplied by four and divided by the total amount of paw placements. Using the RI, single walkway crossings can be objectively analyzed on coordination. Integration of the CatWalk based coordination into the BBB scale indicates that objective analysis of coordination results in reliable and more sensitive assessment of locomotor function. This new method has been tested successfully in determination of positive effects of enriched housing on functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…