• Harefuah · Aug 2006

    Comparative Study

    [Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing--the Tel Aviv Voice and Swallowing Disorders Clinic].

    • J T Cohen, M Eini, S Belkovitz, Y Manor, and D M Fliss.
    • Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. jacob_cohen@hotmail.com
    • Harefuah. 2006 Aug 1; 145 (8): 572-6, 631.

    AbstractFiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) involves passing a fiberoptic laryngoscope transnasally to visualize the hypopharynx, larynx, and proximal trachea in order to assess swallowing disorders. FEES has been compared with the modified barium swallow (MBS) (the presumed "gold standard"). To date, reports have demonstrated that FEES is as sensitive as, or even more sensitive, for use as a tool in swallowing assessment compared with the MBS. FEES provides the clinician with a safe, portable, effective, and valid means of evaluating individuals with swallowing disturbances. FEES allows the examiner to identify swallowing physiology, determine the safest and least restrictive level of oral intake, implement appropriate compensatory techniques, and identify a dysphagia rehabilitation plan. In this article we present the Tel-Aviv Voice and Swallowing Disorders Center experience. Out of 100 patients that were referred to our center for swallowing evaluation 97 patients underwent 102 FEES examinations. Three patients couldn't tolerate the examination. In 63% of the patients swallowing pathology was found. FEES were performed by teamwork involving a speech-language pathologist and otolaryngologist collaborating together thus optimally managing the individual with dysphagia safely and efficiently.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.