• C S Goodchild, Z Guo, J Freeman, and J P Gent.
• Department of Anaesthesia, University of Leeds, UK.
• Br J Anaesth. 1997 May 1; 78 (5): 563-9.

AbstractThe antinociceptive effects of intrathecal 5-HT, fentanyl, ICI197067 and U50488H were assessed by electrical current nociceptive threshold and tail flick latency measurements. Equieffective doses of these agonists were then given intrathecally with a range of doses of naloxone or the highly selective mu opioid antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine. Antagonist dose-response curves were plotted. Other rats were made tolerant to either fentanyl or 5-HT by intrathecal injections of these drugs seven times daily and the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal fentanyl and 5-HT were assessed in each group. All intrathecal drugs caused spinally mediated antinociception in both tests. The antinociceptive effects of intrathecal 5-HT assessed by the electrical test (ECT) but not by tail flick latency (TFL) were suppressed by both opioid antagonists at doses similar to those required to suppress all of the effects of intrathecal fentanyl. The ED50 values were 0.22 (fentanyl, ECT), 0.25 (fentanyl, TFL) and 0.18 (5-HT, ECT) mumol kg-1 for naloxone and for beta-funaltrexamine 2.2 fmol (5-HT, ECT), the same order as that required to produce similar suppression of the antinociceptive effects of fentanyl (46 amol: fentanyl, ECT; 4.6 fmol: fentanyl, TFL) and very different from the ED50 for beta-FNA suppression of the antinociceptive effects of the kappa opioid, U50488H (5.88 pmol). Cross tolerance in both directions was demonstrated between intrathecal fentanyl and 5-HT in the electrical test but not in the tail flick test. We conclude that intrathecal 5-HT caused spinally mediated antinociceptive effects revealed by electrical current and tail flick latency tests. The antinociceptive effects in the electrical test involved spinal cord mu opioid receptors.

32 keywords...

hide…