• Health services research · Oct 2014

    Comparative Study

    Template matching for auditing hospital cost and quality.

    • Jeffrey H Silber, Paul R Rosenbaum, Richard N Ross, Justin M Ludwig, Wei Wang, Bijan A Niknam, Nabanita Mukherjee, Philip A Saynisch, Orit Even-Shoshan, Rachel R Kelz, and Lee A Fleisher.
    • The Department of Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
    • Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 1; 49 (5): 1446-74.

    ObjectiveDevelop an improved method for auditing hospital cost and quality.Data Sources/SettingMedicare claims in general, gynecologic and urologic surgery, and orthopedics from Illinois, Texas, and New York between 2004 and 2006.Study DesignA template of 300 representative patients was constructed and then used to match 300 patients at hospitals that had a minimum of 500 patients over a 3-year study period.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsFrom each of 217 hospitals we chose 300 patients most resembling the template using multivariate matching.Principal FindingsThe matching algorithm found close matches on procedures and patient characteristics, far more balanced than measured covariates would be in a randomized clinical trial. These matched samples displayed little to no differences across hospitals in common patient characteristics yet found large and statistically significant hospital variation in mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, readmissions, length of stay, ICU days, cost, and surgical procedure length. Similar patients at different hospitals had substantially different outcomes.ConclusionThe template-matched sample can produce fair, directly standardized audits that evaluate hospitals on patients with similar characteristics, thereby making benchmarking more believable. Through examining matched samples of individual patients, administrators can better detect poor performance at their hospitals and better understand why these problems are occurring.© Health Research and Educational Trust.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.