• Kojun Okamoto, Isamu Koyama, Yasuko Toshimitsu, Masayasu Aikawa, Katsuya Okada, Yosuke Ueno, and Mitsuo Miyazawa.
• Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan. kokamoto@saitama-med.ac.jp
• Hepato Gastroenterol. 2012 May 1; 59 (115): 875-7.

Background/AimsThe Pringle maneuver is generally performed to reduce the amount of blood loss during hepatic resection. We have developed a method to sufficiently control blood loss during hepatectomy without applying the Pringle maneuver. This study was performed to determine the safety and operative blood loss in hepatectomy performed by this new method.MethodologyWe performed 102 hepatic resections without the Pringle maneuver. We retrospectively compared the short-term operative outcome between these 102 cases and another 75 hepatic resections performed with the Pringle maneuver. The resections without the Pringle maneuver were performed using a soft-coagulation system.ResultsThe median length of the surgery using the soft-coagulation system without the Pringle maneuver was 135 minutes, significantly shorter than the surgical time required for resection with the Pringle maneuver 297 minutes (p<0.001). The median volume of operative blood loss was significantly lower in the non-Pringle-maneuver group (200cc vs. 704cc; p<0.001). Regarding postoperative liver function, AST, ALT, T-Bil and PT, levels were all significantly improved in the non-Pringle-maneuver group (p<0.01).ConclusionsOur data suggest that hepatic resection using a soft-coagulation system without the Pringle maneuver is extremely safe and effective in controlling bleeding.

39 keywords...

hide…