• C Ewertsen, K Rue Nielsen, and M Bachmann Nielsen.
• Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. caroline.ewertsen@dadlnet.dk
• Ultraschall Med. 2011 Dec 1; 32 (6): 614-8.

PurposeTo evaluate the overall accuracy and time spent on biopsy guided by electromagnetic needle tracking in a phantom compared with the standard technique of US-guided biopsy with an attached steering device. Furthermore, to evaluate off-plane biopsy guided by needle tracking.Materials And MethodsThree different series of biopsy were performed in a phantom: one with a steering device attached to the transducer without needle tracking, simulating the standard ultrasound-guided biopsy procedure (series 1), one freehand in the scan plane using electromagnetic needle tracking (series 2), and one freehand off-the-scan plane using electromagnetic needle tracking (series 3). The phantom contained spheres of 1  cm in diameter filled with red dye. Each time of the phantom surface was perforated counted as an attempt.Results180 biopsies were performed. The mean time spent on each biopsy in series one was 19.9 seconds (SD: 9.1), in series two 34.1 seconds (SD: 17.9) and in series three 34.4 seconds (SD: 14.0). The overall rate of success was: 88 % for in-plane needle-guided biopsy, 87 % for in-plane needle tracking, and 92 % for off-plane needle tracking. No statistically significant difference between the methods was shown.ConclusionNeedle navigation is a potentially valuable tool for image-guided biopsy with an equal rate of success compared with conventional image-guided biopsy. Furthermore, it enables off-plane image-guided biopsy.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

21 keywords...

hide…