• Meng-Hua Chen, Feng-Qing Song, Lu Xie, Li-Ping Wang, Jun-Yu Lu, Xian-Wei Zhang, and Xiao-Fen Tian.
• Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, PR China. cmhnn@sina.com
• Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct 1; 27 (8): 935-41.

AbstractThe advantage of vasopressin over epinephrine in the treatment of cardiac arrest (CA) is still being debated, and it is not clear whether a high dose of vasopressin is beneficial or detrimental during or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a rat model of CA. In this study, asphyxial CA was induced in 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats. After 10 minutes of asphyxia, CPR was initiated; and the effects of different doses of vasopressin (low dose, 0.4 U/kg; medium dose, 0.8 U/kg; and high dose, 2.4 U/kg; intravenous; n = 10 in each group) and a saline control (isotonic sodium chloride solution, 1 mL, intravenous) were compared. Outcome measures included the rate of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and changes of hemodynamic and respiratory variables after ROSC. The rates of ROSC were 1 of 10 in the saline group and 8 of 10 in each of the 3 vasopressin groups. There were no differences in mean aortic pressure or changes of respiratory function after CPR among the vasopressin groups. However, the heart rate was lower in the high-dose vasopressin group than in the low- and medium-dose groups. These findings indicate that different doses of vasopressin result in a similar outcome of CPR, with no additional benefits afforded by a high dose of vasopressin during or after CPR, in a rat model of asphyxial CA. The mechanism and physiologic significance of the relative bradycardia that occurred in the high-dose vasopressin group are currently unknown and require further investigation.

20 keywords...

hide…