• Sarah K Rozycki, Fredrick P Dixon, Melissa A Yopp, Norma J Maxvold, and Bruce K Rubin.
• Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
• Respir Care. 2015 Aug 1; 60 (8): 111311191113-9.

BackgroundEndotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs create a seal to protect against secretion entry to the lungs. Cuff inflation currently is recommended at 20-30 cm H2O pressure. ETT designs have variable seal performance in bench studies using rigid tracheal models lacking the dynamic characteristics of the human trachea. We compared ETT designs within a new, biorealistic tracheal model to assess cuff and suction performance in the setting of a compliant trachea.MethodsThree ETT designs (Mallinckrodt Hi-Lo, KimVent Microcuff, and Sheridan/HVT) were tested for performance by simulant leakage below the cuff and air leakage (measured as return tidal volume ≥ 80% delivered) over a range of cuff (5-25 cm H2O) and end-expiratory pressure (PEEP 0-15 cm H2O). Subglottic suction channel performance was tested in 2 ETTs (TaperGuard Evac [Covidien] and ISIS HVT [Teleflex]) as time to evacuate the simulant.ResultsAll ETT cuffs provided effective seals at an inflation pressure of 12 cm H2O when PEEP was ≤ 5 cm H2O. The Microcuff ETT sealed at the lowest pressure of 6 cm H2O, whereas the Sheridan/HVT cuff sealed at 12 cm H2O (P = .01). With a PEEP of 15 cm H2O, a reciprocal increase in air leak occurred, requiring a cuff inflation up to 22 cm H2O to maintain a return tidal volume at ≥ 80% delivered. Suction channel performance improved in the lateral position compared with supine for both ETT designs during continuous 15 mm Hg suction pressure (P = .001).ConclusionsWithin a novel model with normal trachea compliance, we found all ETT designs tested to seal at lower than current recommended cuff pressures.Copyright © 2015 by Daedalus Enterprises.

19 keywords...

hide…