• Ceska Gynekol · Oct 2007

    Multicenter Study

    [Prediction of preeclampsia using the integrated test markers].

    • P Urdzík, R Dankovcík, A Ostró, and I Lazár.
    • II gynekologicko-pôrodnícka klinika LF UPJS a FN L. Pasteura, Kosice. purdzik@pobox.sk
    • Ceska Gynekol. 2007 Oct 1; 72 (5): 336-43.

    ObjectiveAuthor's objective was to ascertain the option for prediction of preeclampsia using the integrated test markers on the population of pregnant women in Kosice city.DesignRetrospective, longitudinal, multicenter study.Setting2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of P. J. Safárik, Kosice, Slovak Republic.MethodsThe study group comprised 578 pregnant patients of 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the period from 01.11.2001 until 31.01.2005 for integrated test consisting of (CRL, NT, concentration of PAPP-A, uE3, hCG, AFP). Primary outcome was defined as incidence of preeclampsia during pregnancy. Data on incidence of preeclampsia was collected from birth journals and records in 578 patients retrospectivelly. In order to make use of the summary information provided by the markers we have used the method of logistic regression to identify statistically significant predictors of the binary outcome measure of preeclampsia. First we developed an equation based on all available predictors. Statistically insignificant predictors were gradually eliminated from the model (Stepwise regression) until the final model remained, for which a ROC curve was developed and values of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values at 5% FP (false positivity) were calculated.ResultsThe final model of preeclampsia, which is based only on statistically significant markers of integrated test achieved--at 5% FP and 95% specificity--36.4% sensitivity and 22.7% positive and 97,4 negative predictive value for prediction of preeclampsia in pregnant women.ConclusionOur results, as well as the results of other studies, lead to the conclusion, that in spite of the multitude of biochemical markers and various options for their combination with ultrasound markers for prediction of preeclampsia, so far it has been impossible to find a combination which would meet the following criteria: (1) high sensitivity and specificity at low false positive values and high positive and negative predictive value, (2) application as a screening method for prediction of preeclampsia in unselected population of pregnant women.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.