• Der Nervenarzt · Oct 1996

    Review Comparative Study

    [Differential therapy of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. An analysis with reference to personal microsurgery experiences].

    • C Schaller, C Pavlidis, and J Schramm.
    • Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik, Bonn.
    • Nervenarzt. 1996 Oct 1; 67 (10): 860-9.

    AbstractA total of 126 patients (63 female, 63 male) underwent microsurgical removal of their cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) by the same surgeon. The mean age at surgery was 34.7 (6-72) years. The symptoms were intracerebral hemorrhage (37.3%), seizure disorder (34.9%) or focal neurological deficits and minor symptoms. According to the Spetzler/Martin scale, 20.6% of the AVMs were grade I, 28.6% grade II, 32.5% grade III, 14.3% grade IV and 4% grade V. In all, 78 AVMs (61.9%) were located in functionally important brain regions. The series was split into three different groups: small AVMs under 3 cm in diameter (n = 62/49.2%), medium-sized AVMs (n = 58/46%) and large AVMs (n = 6/4.8%). Seventeen patients had preoperative embolization of their AVM. All patients had postoperative angiographic control and 3- and 6-month follow-up. One patient died (0.8%), and another one (0.8%), in whom the AVM was incompletely resected, suffered a secondary hemorrhage. Seventeen (27.4%) of the patients with small AVMs developed transient neurological worsening post-operatively, which remained permanently significant in 3.2%. The respective numbers for the patients with medium-sized AVMs were 48.3% and 10.3% and for the large AVMs 83.3% and 33.3%. The results of microsurgical removal of cerebral AVMs can still be considered superior to the results of stereotactic radiosurgical treatment available from the literature-even for small AVMs. This is due to immediate exclusion of the AVM under direct local control of the angioarchitecture and thereby a reduced risk of secondary hemorrhaging and a decreasing morbidity rate with increasing time after the operation. Radiosurgical treatment requires a 2-year latency period for obliteration and carries a mortality rate of up to 12.5% and a rate of unexpected side effects of up to 20%. This treatment should be reserved for small, deep, surgically inaccessible AVMs or used as part of a multimodality treatment regimen consisting of partial embolization, partial excision and consecutive radiation of the residual nidus in initially very large AVMs. Embolization therapy-such as radiosurgery-carries a significant risk of morbidity (8%) and a mortality rate of up to 6%. It should only be considered for AVMs that are expected to be fully obliterated afterwards, or for primary inoperable AVMs that are to be changed into operable ones by embolization. Size reduction of otherwise operable AVMs does not justify the additional risk of embolization. Close collaboration of the specialties involved is desirable.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.