• Charles L Nelson, Robert B Jones, Nathaniel C Wingert, Michael Foltzer, and Thomas R Bowen.
• Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014 Jul 1; 472 (7): 2208-14.

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection is a leading cause of failure after two-stage reimplantation. One cause of relapse may be persistent subclinical infection. Difficulty exists in detecting biofilm-forming infections. Sonication disrupts biofilm and has led to higher rates of positive intraoperative cultures.Questions/PurposesOur aims in this study were to determine (1) if sonication results were predictive of failure, including reinfection, at 2-year followup; and (2) whether sonication of antibiotic spacers at the time of reimplantation improves sensitivity of intraoperative cultures.MethodsWe prospectively followed 36 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic hip or knee infection. Minimum followup was 19 months (mean, 29.9 months; range, 19–38 months). Results of intraoperative cultures and sonicated antibiotic spacers were analyzed.ResultsPositive sonication results were predictive of failure as defined by reinfection at 2-year followup. Among the 18 patients who had positive sonication results, reinfection developed in nine patients (50%) compared with two of 18 patients (11%) with negative sonication results (odds ratio, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.2–69.0). Sonication of antibiotic spacers improved the sensitivity of intraoperative cultures from 45% to 82%. [corrected].ConclusionsSonication of antibiotic spacers appears to be useful in predicting failure attributable to recurrent infection after two-stage reimplantation. For patients with positive sonication cultures during reimplantation, more aggressive antimicrobial treatment may be indicated after reimplantation.Level Of EvidenceLevel III, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

41 keywords...

hide…