• Plast. Reconstr. Surg. · Nov 2012

    Advanced cranial reconstruction using intracranial free flaps and cranial bone grafts: an algorithmic approach developed from the modern battlefield.

    • Anand R Kumar, Diya Tantawi, Rocco Armonda, and Ian Valerio.
    • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. anand.kumar@chp.edu
    • Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012 Nov 1; 130 (5): 1101-9.

    BackgroundThe objective of this study was to report outcomes after initiation of an algorithmic approach (Bethesda protocol) using intracranial free flaps, cranial bone autografts, and dermal/fat grafts to treat warfare-related cranial frontofacial defects after war-related decompressive craniectomy.MethodsA retrospective review of personnel undergoing complex cranial defect reconstruction that required free flap interpositions for dead space obliteration, cranial bone grafting, or dermal/fat grafting for orbital defects was performed over a 52-month period.ResultsFrom March of 2003 to July of 2011, 13 patients were identified who underwent complex craniofacial defect reconstruction. All patients were male (average age, 25 years). Average follow-up was 3.6 years. Glasgow Coma Scale score was 7 initially and 9 on arrival to the continental United States. Average evacuation time was 4.2 days. Forty-six percent of injuries were blast injuries. Nine patients (69 percent) underwent hemicraniectomies and four (31 percent) underwent bifrontal craniectomies. Two patients required free flaps and four required free flaps and cranial bone grafts for skull base reconstruction. Five patients required cranial bone grafts and two required cranial bone grafts with dermal fat grafts for reconstruction. All patients were complication free at conclusion of the study. The initial free flap success rate was 86 percent (six of seven flaps). Successful frontal bar/free flap reconstruction was present in 100 percent and the secondary cranioplasty rate was 77 percent.ConclusionDecompressive craniectomy defects associated with orbital, sinus, and skull base defects can be successfully reconstructed using an algorithmic approach with low morbidity and high secondary cranioplasty retention rates.Clinical Question/Level Of EvidenceTherapeutic, IV.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.