• Dis. Colon Rectum · Jan 2016

    Comparing Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Both Oral and Systemic Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Systemic Antibiotics Alone for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

    • Min Chen, Xue Song, Liang-Zhou Chen, Zhi-Dong Lin, and Xue-Li Zhang.
    • 1 Department of General Surgery, Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Xiamen, China.
    • Dis. Colon Rectum. 2016 Jan 1; 59 (1): 70-78.

    BackgroundThe discussion on the role of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery is still ongoing.ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to determine whether oral systemic antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation are superior to systemic antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation for prophylaxis of bacterial infection during elective colorectal operation.Data SourcesEmbase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms oral, antibiotics/antimicrobial, colorectal/rectal/colon/rectum, and surgery/operation.Study SelectionAll of the available randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of combined oral and systemic antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation with systemic antibiotics alone and mechanical bowel preparation in colorectal surgery and defined surgical site infection based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were included.InterventionAll of the statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2 software. A fixed model was used if there was no evidence of heterogeneity; otherwise, a random-effects model was used.Main Outcome MeasuresWe focused on incidence of surgical site infection among the groups.ResultsSeven randomized controlled trials that consisted of 1769 cases were eligible for analysis. We found that both total surgical site infection and incisional surgical site infection were significantly reduced in patients who received oral systemic antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation compared with patients who received systemic antibiotics alone and mechanical bowel preparation (total: 7.2% vs 16.0%, p < 0.00001; incisional: 4.6% vs 12.1%, p < 0.00001). However, no significant difference was detected in the rate of organ/space surgical site infection (4.0% vs 4.8%; p = 0.56) after elective colorectal surgery.LimitationsThe meta-analysis was limited by the risk of bias because a majority of the studies did not use the blinding method.ConclusionsOral systemic antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation significantly lowered the incidence of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery compared with systemic antibiotics alone and mechanical bowel preparation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…