-
Swiss medical weekly · Oct 1998
Comparative Study[Comparison of Quick/INR values of whole capillary blood (CoaguChek Plus) and venous citrate plasma in patients with and without oral anticoagulation].
- S Burri, F Demarmels Biasiutti, B Lämmle, and W A Wuillemin.
- Hämatologisches Zentrallabor, Universität, Inselspital Bern.
- Swiss Med Wkly. 1998 Oct 31; 128 (44): 1723-9.
BackgroundThe prothrombin time, also called thromboplastin time ("Quick"), is usually measured by using citrated plasma from venous blood. Recently, portable coagulation monitors have been developed which measure prothrombin time using non-anticoagulated capillary whole blood from a finger-stick. In the present study we evaluated the CoaguChek Plus coagulation monitor in comparison with a standard laboratory method in various patient groups: patients on oral anticoagulation with or without heparinisation, patients receiving heparin without oral anticoagulation, patients with a deficiency of one of the coagulation factors of the extrinsic or common pathway, and patients with liver disease. Furthermore, we studied the influence of the haemoglobin concentration on the test results.MethodCapillary prothrombin time was measured by using the portable coagulation monitor CoaguChek Plus and venous prothrombin time was assessed by using Thromborel S.ResultsWe found a correlation coefficient of 0.94 between capillary and venous INR values in 216 determinations from 167 patients. The slope of the regression line was 1.03, and the y-intercept 0.05, 93.5% of the results were within 0.9, 90.7% within 0.7, and 83.8% within 0.5 INR units. Similar results were obtained in patients on oral anticoagulation, patients with a deficiency of a factor of the extrinsic system and in patients with liver disease. Correlation and agreement were somewhat lower among patients on oral anticoagulation and simultaneous heparinisation (40 patients): correlation coefficient was 0.83, slope of the regression line was 0.87 and y-intercept was 0.27 INR units. No influence of the haemoglobin concentration on INR results could be demonstrated.ConclusionOur results show the CoaguChek Plus coagulation monitor to be a valuable tool for measuring prothrombin time in patients on oral anticoagulation, in patients with liver disease to estimate the capacity of protein synthesis, and to screen for possible deficiencies of one of the coagulation factors of the extrinsic or common pathway. However, based on our preliminary data we cannot recommend the use of the CoaguChek Plus coagulation monitor in heparinised patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.