-
Musculoskeletal care · Dec 2008
A Delphi study investigating consensus among expert physiotherapists in relation to the management of low back pain.
- Fraser C Ferguson, Margaret Brownlee, and Valerie Webster.
- Clydebank Health Centre, Glasgow, UK. Fraser.Ferguson@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
- Musculoskeletal Care. 2008 Dec 1; 6 (4): 197-210.
ObjectivesLow back pain (LBP) affects a large proportion of the adult population, with over 90% of people expected to experience symptoms associated with it. LBP is one of the most common conditions managed by primary health care practitioners, and physiotherapists are the largest professional group responsible for its management. Clinical guidelines exist for the management of LBP and are based on the best available evidence. However, there is currently no consensus on the actual physiotherapy management of this condition.MethodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted among expert physiotherapists (n = 34). A focus group was initially convened to review the key questions, developed following a review of the literature. An expert panel then produced their responses, which were ranked in subsequent rounds, using a five-point Likert scale, until a predetermined point of consensus was reached.ResultsThe results of this study indicated that it is possible to establish consensus among expert clinicians in relation to the management of LBP, with consensus reached on 64 (67.3%) of the 95 responses identified. The results also showed that, in general, physiotherapy management within the location studied conformed to current LBP evidence-based clinical guidelines. In addition, the expert panel identified the importance of a biopsychosocial approach to LBP management.ConclusionsAlthough the study identified that consensus existed in relation to many aspects of physiotherapy management of LBP, it was also noted that confusion existed in relation to several key areas of practice, highlighting the need for further work.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.