• Naoya Iguchi, Osamu Hirao, Akinori Uchiyama, Takashi Mashimo, Masaji Nishimura, and Yuji Fujino.
• Intensive Care Unit, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. toooldwaterboys@yahoo.co.jp
• J Anesth. 2010 Dec 1; 24 (6): 888-92.

PurposeHigh-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is thought to protect the lungs of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The performance and mechanical characteristics of high-frequency oscillatory ventilators, especially with regard to delivering appropriate tidal volume (V(T)) to compromised lungs, might affect the outcome of patients. We evaluated the performance of two such ventilators using a model lung with a position sensor.MethodsWe tested the Metran R100 and SensorMedics 3100B. V(T) was measured using the model lung with the compliance set at 20 or 50 ml/cmH₂O and the resistance at 0 or 20 cmH₂O/l/s. Oscillator frequency was set at 5, 7, and 9 Hz, and amplitude was set at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% (100% being maximum amplitude available at each setting configuration).ResultsAt each model lung setting, R100 delivered greater V(T) at 5 Hz. V(T) differences between the ventilators decreased as frequency increased and were negligible at 9 Hz. At each model lung setting and frequency, as amplitude increased from 25% to 100%, V(T) increased proportionally more with R100. With an I:E ratio of 1:1, 3100B delivered greater V(T) than with 1:2.ConclusionBecause it is able to deliver comparably greater V(T), R100 may be a better choice for HFOV in critical ARDS patients. Better proportionality may be a result of more effective amplitude titration for adjusting PaCO₂ during oscillation.

22 keywords...

hide…