• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Sep 2007

    Cognitive brain function after hypothermic circulatory arrest assessed by cognitive P300 evoked potentials.

    • Takashi Kunihara, Dietmar Tscholl, Frank Langer, Günter Heinz, Fumihiro Sata, and Hans-Joachim Schäfers.
    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep 1; 32 (3): 507-13.

    BackgroundThe role of hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) in cardiovascular surgery is controversial and assumed to result in neurocognitive dysfunction that is not always detected by standard clinical observation. We assessed cognitive P300 visual evoked potentials (P300) in patients undergoing either HCA or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to elucidate whether HCA was associated with postoperative cognitive decline.MethodsThirteen patients undergoing either aortic arch replacement (n=4) or pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (n=9) using HCA (mean: 28+/-11 min, 22+/-2 degrees C) were studied. They were compared to 13 patients undergoing on-pump CABG. P300s were measured 1 day before and 1 week after the operation. We assessed an area under the curve (AUC) between 280 and 600 ms and center of this area [Ct (time), Cv (voltage)]. The ratio of these parameters acquired by target (TG) and non-target (NTG) stimulus (TG/NTG) was calculated to assess concentration on TG stimulus and defined as concentration index (CI: CI(AUC), CI(Ct), and CI(Cv)).ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative characteristics between groups. There were neither strokes nor hospital deaths. Preoperatively, the HCA group could not concentrate on target stimulus as well as the control group in frontal leads (CI(AUC) and CI(Cv) were lower in HCA group than in control group). However, the HCA group could concentrate on target stimulus better than the control group postoperatively because postoperative CI(AUC) (pre-operation: 1.1+/-0.5 to post-operation: 1.7+/-0.4, P=.02) and CI(Cv) (1.1+/-0.4 to 1.6+/-0.4, P=.01) were significantly improved in the HCA group, whereas these were significantly impaired in the control group (CI(AUC): 1.6+/-0.6 to 1.3+/-0.4, P=.03, CI(Cv): 1.5+/-0.5 to 1.2+/-0.3, P<.01). Postoperative CI(Ct) in the HCA group were significantly impaired in all leads. The duration of HCA did not correlate with any values of postoperative P300. No specific trends were observed in either preoperative or postoperative P300 values between patients with or without postoperative temporary neurological dysfunction (one in each group). Postoperative improvement of CI(AUC) and CI(Cv) in Fz lead were found in 85 and 69% in the HCA group and 23 and 23% in the control group, respectively (CI(AUC): P<.01, CI(Cv): P<.05).ConclusionsP300 detected no significant neurocognitive impairment due to the relatively brief period of HCA (approximately 28 min).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.