• R Robertson, J Eidt, L Bitzer, B Wallace, T Collins, C Parks-Miller, and J Cone.
• Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.
• Am. J. Surg. 1995 Dec 1; 170 (6): 691-4; discussion 694-5.

BackgroundBecause severe acidosis is an indicator of poor prognosis in trauma patients, medical records of these patients were analyzed to determine whether aggressive resuscitation was appropriate.Patients And MethodsData from a level 1 trauma center registry were reviewed retrospectively to identify patients with a pH < or = 7.0. Thirty-seven patients were identified. Severely acidotic patients were compared to average trauma patients in terms of demographics, resuscitation, injury, and outcome. Surviving acidotic patients were also compared to nonsurviving acidotic patients.ResultsHalf of the severely acidotic group survived initial resuscitation with approximately one third surviving to leave the hospital. There were no chronically disabled survivors. Nonsurviving acidotic patients were more unstable, more neurologically depressed, and more severely injured. Resuscitation efforts did not consume excessive hospital resources.ConclusionSevere acidosis alone is not a sufficiently powerful predictor of outcome to justify withholding resuscitation; however, when combined with coma and shock, this condition had no survivors in this small series.

14 keywords...

hide…