-
- A Merelles Tormo, M f Rivera Ortún, F Ballester Díez, J M Antó Boqué, and D Oterino de la Fuente.
- Departament d'Infermeria, Universitat de València, España.
- Gac Sanit. 1999 Jan 1; 13 (1): 30-7.
ObjectiveTo analyse the reliability of the obtained results in the identification of cases of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosed in the medical records of the emergency rooms of the
of Valencia, Spain.MethodsIn the context of a study on the relationship between emergency rooms for asthma and COPD and specific environmental risks, we revised all the emergency rooms medical records of people aged over 14 attended at the of Valencia, Spain, during 1993 and 1994. The observers were two nurses who received previous training in the identification of cases. One observer revised the year 1993 and the other one 1994. To evaluate the reliability of the results we obtained a 24 days sample for each year and we estimated the inter-observer agreement using the Proportion of Observed Agreement (POA) and the Kappa Index (KI) and the 95 % confidence intervals (95% CI). We also carried out a specific analysis for each study category estimating the specific Kappa Index and the Proportions of Specific Agreement (PSA). To assess the inter-observer agreement we used the first 59 days of 1994, to estimate the same indexes mentioned above.ResultsIn the total of emergency rooms, the POA for both observers was 0.99 and the KI was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94) for the first observer and 0.79 (0.76-0.82) for the second one. In the specific analysis the PSA for versus were 0.92 (0.75-1) and 0.48 (0.31-0. 66) respectively. For the analysis of versus the PSA were 0.78 (0.69-0.87) and 0.75 (0.64-0.86). In the inter-observer agreement study we obtained, for the overall analysis, a POA equal to 0.99 and a KI to 0.87 (0.86-0.88). In the specific study the PSA for versus were 0.64 (0.53-0. 74) and 0.82 (0.77-0.87) for versus .ConclusionsThe consistency of the results is good for both observers, but better for the first observer, particularly for asthma. For the COPD category the results are more homogeneous, showing a good concordance for both observers. The results for the inter-observer study also show a good reliability. Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.