• Ahmad K Ismail, Muhammad A Abdul Ghafar, Noor Shaza A Shamsuddin, Nurul A Roslan, Hilwani Kaharuddin, and Nik A Nik Muhamad.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
• J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 1; 49 (3): 287-93.

BackgroundPrehospital care (PHC) pain evaluation is an essential patient assessment to be performed by paramedics. Pain intensity is frequently assessed using Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS) or Visual Analog Scale (VAS).ObjectiveOur aim was to evaluate the agreement between VNRS and VAS in measuring acute pain in prehospital setting and to identify the preference among paramedics and patients.MethodsThis was a 3-month cross-sectional study. Convenience sampling was used to enroll patients with acute pain responded to by the ambulance team. Data from consented patients were analyzed using Bland-Altman method, Spearman's correlation test, and Cohen's κ test.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-three patients participated in this study (median age 32 years; 72.2% male). The median for pain score at the scene was 7.50 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.00) for VAS and 7.00 (IQR: 5.00) for VNRS. The median for pain score on arrival at the hospital was 7.00 (IQR: 3.10) for VAS and 7.00 (IQR: 4.00) for VNRS. There was a strong correlation between VNRS and VAS at the scene (r = 0.865; p < 0.001), as well as on arrival at the hospital (r = 0.933; p < 0.001). Kappa coefficient values and Bland-Altman analysis indicates good agreement between both scales for measuring acute pain. VNRS was the preferred method to measure acute pain by patients and paramedics.ConclusionsVAS performs as well as VNRS in assessing acute pain in PHC. VAS and VNRS must not be used interchangeably to assess acute pain; either method should be used consistently.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…