-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Predictors of weaning outcome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.
- R Alvisi, C A Volta, E R Righini, M Capuzzo, R Ragazzi, M Verri, G Candini, G Gritti, and J Milic-Emili.
- Dept of Biomedical Science and Advanced Therapy, Ospedale S. Anna, University of Ferrara, Italy.
- Eur. Respir. J. 2000 Apr 1; 15 (4): 656-62.
AbstractSeveral threshold values for predicting weaning outcome from mechanical ventilation have been proposed. These values, however, have been obtained in nonhomogeneous patient populations. The aim of the present study was to determine the threshold values in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and compare them to those reported for nonhomogeneous patient populations. The initial weaning trial included 81 COPD patients. Fifty-three of them underwent a successful weaning trial, whereas 28 failed it. The latter were enrolled into the present investigation, and were restudied during a subsequent successful trial. The weaning indices used were those reported in the literature. The threshold values obtained were within 10% of those reported for a nonhomogeneous patients population only for tidal volume and effective compliance. The classification error was <20% for maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), occluded inspiratory pressure swing (deltaPI)/MIP, rapid and shallow breathing (respiratory frequency/tidal volume), and compliance, rate, oxygenation, pressure index (CROP), whereas the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was >0.9 only for deltaPI/MIP and CROP. In conclusion, the threshold values obtained in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who failed the first weaning attempt differed from those previously reported. Although a gold standard weaning index is not available for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, the occluded inspiratory pressure swing/ maximal inspiratory pressure and compliance, rate, oxygenation, pressure index may be candidates for such a role.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.