• Am J Emerg Med · Aug 2016

    External validation of the STONE score and derivation of the modified STONE score.

    • Byunghyun Kim, Kyuseok Kim, Joonghee Kim, You Hwan Jo, Jae Hyuk Lee, Ji Eun Hwang, and Jongdae Park.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University, Bundang Hospital, Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 463-707, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: vogam0619@gmail.com.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 1; 34 (8): 1567-72.

    ObjectiveThe STONE score is a clinical prediction rule for the presence of uncomplicated ureter stones with a low probability of acutely important alternative findings. This study performed an external validation of the STONE score, focusing on the Korean population, and a derivation of the modified STONE score for better specificity and sensitivity.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients complaining of flank pain at a single emergency department from January 2013 to December 2014. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their STONE score. The prevalence of ureter stones and other alternative findings were calculated in each group. We derived a modified STONE score based on a multivariable analysis and performed an interval validation.ResultsFrom the 700 patients included in the analysis, 555 patients (79%) had a ureter stone. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the STONE score was 0.92. The sensitivity of the high stone score was 0.56. In the modified STONE score, nausea, vomiting, and racial predictors were substituted by C-reactive protein and previous stone history. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity of the modified STONE score in the internal validation group significantly increased to 0.94 and 0.80, respectively.ConclusionThe STONE score can be used to predict a ureter stone with a low probability of other alternative findings. The modified STONE score might increase the diagnostic performance in suspicious urinary stone cases.Key PointsWe performed external validation of the STONE score and derivation of the modified STONE score. This scoring system could help the clinicians with radiation reducing decision making.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.