• Int J Stroke · Dec 2014

    Advantages of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance sequences in the visualization of intravascular thrombi in acute ischemic stroke.

    • R Allibert, C Billon Grand, F Vuillier, F Cattin, E Muzard, A Biondi, T Moulin, and E Medeiros.
    • Service de Neurologie, Unité Neurovasculaire, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Service de Neurologie, Unité Neurovasculaire, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France.
    • Int J Stroke. 2014 Dec 1; 9 (8): 980-4.

    BackgroundIn gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), intravascular thrombi (IT) can appear as vascular susceptibility artifacts, linked to local presence of intra-arterial deoxyhaemoglobin, and called susceptibility vessel signs (SVS).AimsOur objectives were to evaluate the sensitivity of susceptibility-weighted sequences, such as T2* weighted angiography (SWAN) in the visualization of SVS compared with T2*, to consider whether it enabled a better understanding of the importance of SVS, and to compare cerebral circulation regulation profiles according to the localization of the SVS (i.e. proximal or distal).MethodsWe prospectively studied the clinical and imaging data of 78 consecutive patients admitted for acute cerebral ischemia to the stroke unit of Besançon University Hospital between 1 April 2009 and 31 January 2010.ResultsAn SVS was visualized in 44/78 (56%) patients using SWAN and in 13/78 (16%) patients using T2*. All the SVS visible using T2* were also visible on the SWAN. The inter-observer kappa score was 0·72 [CI (0·53-0·91)] for T2*, 0·72 [CI (0·57-0·87)] for SWAN, and weighted kappa was 0·77 [CI (0·61-0·92)] for both T2* and SWAN. When an MCA occlusion was visible on MRA imaging (22/78 patients), a SVS was visualized in 7/22 cases (31·8%) using T2* and in 20/22 cases (91%) using SWAN. When the occlusion was visible in the M1 or M2 segments (17/78 patients), an SVS was visualized in 6/17 cases (35·3%) using T2* and in 15/17 cases (88·2%) using SWAN. When the occlusion was visible in the M3 segment (5/78 patients), an SVS was visualized in 1/5 cases (20%) using T2* and in 5/5 cases (100%) using SWAN. Presence of SVS was not associated with cardioembolic etiology of the stroke.ConclusionsSWAN was more sensitive than T2* in the visualization of SVS in the intracranial arteries during the acute phase of ischemic stroke. Our study shows that the low number of SVS visualized using T2* in previous studies is probably related to a lack of sensitivity of the sequence, rather than to the nature or age of the thrombus. The greater sensitivity of SWAN seems to be linked to the visualization of SVS in cases of small thrombi.© 2014 World Stroke Organization.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…