-
- Kirstyn Shaw and Mary Armitage.
- Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians.
- Clin Med. 2005 Sep 1; 5 (5): 460-4.
AbstractThe aim of revalidation is to reassure the public that doctors are up to date and fit to practise. The Royal College of Physicians has developed various programmes of work, both ongoing and under development, in support of revalidation. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance for doctors about the standards of practice expected and the types of evidence required for revalidation. A range of methods and tools are outlined that could be used by doctors to demonstrate their commitment to evaluating and reflecting on the way they practise medicine. These methods include ways of assessing both professional standards and clinical competence. Although the conclusions of the Chief Medical Officer in terms of the absolute requirements for revalidation are still unknown, the College is committed to supporting its Members and Fellows to prepare for revalidation through setting educational, professional and clinical standards in medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.