-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewAnticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks.
- P J Koudstaal.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Rotterdam, 40 Dr Molewaterplein, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GD. koudstaal@neur.azr.nl
- Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2000 Jan 1 (2): CD000187.
BackgroundPeople with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation who have had a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke are at risk of recurrent stroke.ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to compare the effect of anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy, for secondary prevention, in people with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and previous cerebral ischaemia.Search StrategyThe reviewer searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register and contacted trialists.Selection CriteriaRandomised trials comparing oral anticoagulants with aspirin in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and a previous transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke.Data Collection And AnalysisOne reviewer extracted the data.Main ResultsOne trial was included, involving 455 patients. They received either anticoagulants (International Normalised Ratio 2.5 to 4.0), or 300 milligrams of aspirin per day. People joined the trial within three months of transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. The mean follow-up was 2.3 years. Anticoagulant therapy approximately halved the odds of serious vascular events (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0. 83). This equates to preventing an extra 50 vascular events per year for every 1000 patients treated. Anticoagulant therapy decreased the odds of recurrent stroke by two-thirds (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.59). This translates to preventing an extra 60 strokes for every 1000 patients treated per year. Major extracranial bleeds occurred more often in patients given anticoagulants (odds ratio 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 12.99). The absolute difference was 2.8% versus 0.9% bleeds per year. None of the patients on anticoagulants and one on aspirin had an intracerebral bleed.Reviewer's ConclusionsThe evidence from one trial suggests that anticoagulant therapy can benefit people with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischaemia. Aspirin may be a useful alternative if there is a contraindication to anticoagulant therapy. The risk of adverse events appears to be higher with anticoagulant therapy than aspirin.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.