• D Michaloudis, O Fraidakis, A Petrou, C Gigourtsi, and F Parthenakis.
• Anaesthesiology Department, University Hospital, Iraklion, Crete, Greece.
• Anaesthesia. 1998 May 1; 53 (5): 435-9.

AbstractThe effects of isoflurane and halothane on the QT interval were investigated during induction of anaesthesia. Fifty-one unpremedicated, ASA grade 1 children were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with either isoflurane (n = 25) or halothane (n = 26) and was maintained to the end of the study with end-tidal concentrations of between 2.5% and 3%. Recording of the electrocardiograph, heart rate and systolic arterial pressure were obtained at the following times: before induction of anaesthesia; 1 min and 3 min after stable end-tidal concentrations of anaesthetic agent had been reached; 1 min and 3 min following vecuronium administration; at the time of tracheal intubation and 1 min and 3 min later. Isoflurane significantly prolonged the QT interval (p < 0.001), in contrast to halothane which shortened it (p < 0.01). Heart rate remained largely unchanged during isoflurane anaesthesia but it decreased in the presence of halothane (p < 0.001). In both groups, systolic arterial pressure decreased significantly after induction of anaesthesia (p < 0.001) and remained so to the end of the study. In the isoflurane group, 12 children developed ECG repolarisation abnormalities and in one child an arrhythmia was noticed. In the halothane group, one child developed repolarisation changes while arrhythmias were observed in 10 children. There were no adverse sequelae. It is concluded that halothane may be a better anaesthetic agent than isoflurane for use in children with a prolonged QT interval.

21 keywords...

hide…