• Eur J Emerg Med · Dec 2005

    Does the National Emergency X-ray Utilization Study make a difference?

    • Christine Dearden and Declan Hughes.
    • Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Christine.deaeden@royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk
    • Eur J Emerg Med. 2005 Dec 1; 12 (6): 278-81.

    ObjectiveTo assess whether the introduction of the National Emergency X-ray Utilization Study guidelines in a UK emergency department reduced the number of patients having cervical spine radiographs and altered the accuracy of diagnosis of cervical spine injury.MethodsThis was a prospective, observational study. The number of patients with recent neck injury who had cervical spine radiographs taken was assessed for 3 months before and three months after the introduction of the National Emergency X-ray Utilization Study guidelines to an urban emergency department in the UK. The number of injuries missed by emergency department doctors during the two 3-month periods was also recorded.ResultsPrior to using the guidelines, 252 of 715 patients (35%) were X-rayed and when using the guidelines, 268 of 706 patients (38%) were X-rayed. No significant difference was observed between the rates of X-ray in the two groups (P=0.288). No injuries were missed by emergency department doctors either before or after the introduction of the guidelines.ConclusionIntroduction of the National Emergency X-ray Utilization Study guidelines to a UK emergency department did not reduce the number of patients having cervical spine radiographs after neck trauma and had no effect on the pick-up rate for cervical spine injuries.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…