• K C Man, B D Williamson, M Niebauer, E Daoud, O Bakr, S A Strickberger, J D Hummel, W Kou, and F Morady.
• Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.
• Am. J. Cardiol. 1994 Dec 1; 74 (11): 1119-23.

AbstractNo prospective studies have compared sotalol and amiodarone during electropharmacologic testing. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the electrophysiologic effects of sotalol and amiodarone in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Patients with coronary artery disease and sustained monomorphic VT inducible by programmed stimulation were randomly assigned to receive either sotalol (n = 17) or amiodarone (n = 17). The sotalol dose was titrated to 240 mg twice daily over 7 days. Amiodarone dosing consisted of 600 mg 3 times daily for 10 days. An electrophysiologic test was performed in the baseline state and at the end of the loading regimen. An adequate response was defined as the inability to induce VT or the ability to induce only relatively slow hemodynamically stable VT. During the follow-up electrophysiologic test, 24% of patients taking sotalol and 41% of those taking amiodarone had an adequate response to therapy (p = 0.30). Amiodarone lengthened the mean VT cycle length to a greater degree than sotalol (28% vs 12%, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the effects of sotalol and amiodarone on the ventricular effective refractory period. In patients with coronary artery disease, amiodarone and sotalol are similar in efficacy in the treatment of VT as assessed by electropharmacologic testing. The effects of the 2 drugs on ventricular refractoriness are similar, but amiodarone slows VT to a greater extent than sotalol.

17 keywords...

hide…