• Hilla Sarig Bahat, Patrice L Weiss, and Yocheved Laufer.
• Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa, Israel. hbahat@research.haifa.ac.il
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec 1; 91 (12): 1884-90.

ObjectiveTo compare cervical kinematics during functional motion in patients with neck pain and in asymptomatic participants using a novel virtual reality assessment.DesignClinical comparative trial.SettingParticipants were recruited from university staff and students, and from a local physical therapy clinic.ParticipantsPatients with chronic neck pain (n=25) and asymptomatic participants (n=42).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresKinematic measures (response time, peak and mean velocity, number of velocity peaks, time to peak velocity percentage) were sampled while participants were engaged in the virtual game. Group and motion direction differences were assessed with a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer testing, and contrast analysis when relevant.ResultsParticipants with neck pain had lower peak and mean velocities than the asymptomatic participants (P<.0001). They also demonstrated a greater number of velocity peaks, indicating impaired motion smoothness (P=.0036). No significant group differences were found for response time or for time to peak velocity percentage. Cervical rotations were significantly faster and smoother than flexion and extension movements (P<.05). The overall impairment percentage in velocity and smoothness of cervical motion in patients with neck pain ranged from 22% to 44% compared with asymptomatic participants.ConclusionsVelocity and smoothness of cervical motion were more restricted in patients with chronic neck pain than found previously. Unlike range of motion and other static measurements, these dynamic variables reflect functional cervical motion and therefore contribute to a better understanding of the impairment associated with neck pain. Because the ability to move quickly in response to external stimuli is a commonly occurring phenomenon, this deficit is highly relevant to clinical assessment and management.Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…