• C Bode, T K Nordt, K Peter, R W Smalling, M S Runge, and W Kübler.
• Medizinische Klinik III (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pulmonologie, Heidelberg, Germany.
• Am. J. Cardiol. 1996 Dec 19; 78 (12A): 16-9.

AbstractThrombolytic therapy has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity after acute myocardial infarction. Therapeutic benefit seems to be directly correlated with completeness of reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow) of the infarct-related coronary artery, as well as the timeliness of reperfusion. To determine which regimen of reteplase (r-PA), a deletion mutant of wild-type tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), is most effective for clinical thrombolysis, several reteplase regimens were compared with the most successful standard regimens of recombinant t-PA (alteplase) in 2 large-scale, randomized studies. All patients received aspirin and intravenous heparin. In the Reteplase Angiographic Phase II International Dose Finding Trial (RAPID-1), results in 606 randomized patients showed that a 10 + 10 U double bolus of reteplase was more effective than a 15 U single bolus, a 10 + 5 double bolus, or conventional alteplase (100 mg over 3 hours). In the Reteplase versus Alteplase Patency Investigation During Acute Myocardial Infarction (RAPID-2) trial, results in 324 patients showed that significantly more patients achieved patency of the infarct-related artery (TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow) at 90 minutes with reteplase (10 + 10 U double bolus) than with accelerated alteplase (100 mg over 90 minutes): 83.4% versus 73.3%, respectively (p = 0.03). The incidence of complete patency (TIMI grade 3 flow) at 90 minutes was likewise greater with reteplase than with accelerated alteplase (59.9% vs 45.2%, respectively; p = 0.01). At 60 minutes, the incidence of TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow was also significantly higher with reteplase than with alteplase (81.8% vs 66.1%, respectively; p = 0.01), as was the incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow (51.2% vs 37.4%, respectively; p < 0.031). The 35-day mortality rate was 4.1% for reteplase and 8.4% for alteplase (p = not significant). Reteplase and alteplase did not differ significantly with regard to the occurrence of severe bleeding (12.4% vs 9.7%, respectively) or hemorrhagic stroke (1.2% vs 1.9%, respectively). The results of these trials show that reteplase, given as a 10 + 10 U double bolus, achieves significantly higher rates of early reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery and is associated with significantly fewer acute coronary interventions when compared with front-loaded alteplase. The benefits of reteplase are achieved without any apparent increased risk of complications.

37 keywords...

hide…