• Elizabeth K Vig, Rebecca L Sudore, Karina M Berg, Erik K Fromme, and Robert M Arnold.
• VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. vigster@u.washington.edu
• J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Nov 1; 42 (5): 777-82.

AbstractClinicians may feel conflicted when a patient's legal decision maker is making decisions that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will. We provide evidence-based information to help clinicians consider whether a surrogate's inconsistent decisions are ethically appropriate. Surrogates are not flawless translators of their loved one's preferences; they are influenced by their own hopes and the current clinical context. Patients may be aware of this, are often concerned about burdening their loved ones, and often grant their surrogates leeway in interpreting their wishes. When appropriate, clinicians should respect surrogates' interpretations of patient values and take steps to decrease surrogate stress during the decision-making process. Finally, if clinicians are cognizant of their own values and preferences, they may recognize how these may affect their responses to certain clinical cases.Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…