• Tsung-Tai Chen, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Fen-Ju Chen, Fu-Chang Hu, Yu-Cheng Lu, Wen-Chu Chiang, and Patrick Chow-In Ko.
• Department of Public Health, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan.
• Resuscitation. 2015 Dec 1; 97: 55-60.

ObjectiveInternational institutes have developed their own clinical performance indicators for ambulance services. It is unknown whether these process measures are related to survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to determine whether Emergency Medical Service (EMS)-related ambulance team process measures correlate with patient survival.MethodsFour years of observational data were collected from an urban EMS OHCA registry. The two process measures were achieving an EMS response time ≤4 min and prehospital ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation). The outcome measure was survival to discharge. We used the GLMM (generalised linear mixed model) with stepwise selection to examine this process-outcome link at the patient and EMS team levels, respectively.ResultsWe analyzed 3856 OHCA patients distributed across forty-three EMS ambulance teams. Survival to discharge was observed in 193 (5%) patients. The two EMS team process measures were positively associated with an improvement in survival at the patient level after case-mix adjustment. However, they were not associated with improvement in the risk-adjusted survival rate.ConclusionsThe EMS team-level process measures proposed by international institutes may not predict the risk-adjusted survival rate. Using these measures to motivate EMS teams to improve their quality performance would be questionable. Increased efforts should be devoted to constructing more pivotal EMS team-level process measures that are tightly linked to survival.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…