• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. · Oct 2003

    Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry.

    • Lloyd H Smith, Beate Danielsen, Mark E Allen, and Rosemary Cress.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento 95817, USA. llsmith@ucdavis.edu
    • Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003 Oct 1; 189 (4): 1128-35.

    ObjectiveThis study provides revised population-based measurements for the occurrence rates of cancer associated with obstetric delivery and examines perinatal and cancer-related outcomes within the group of women with 4,846,505 obstetric deliveries in California, inclusive of the years 1991 through 1999.Study DesignThis observational study used a population-based retrospective review of cases identified as a result of computer linkage of maternal/neonatal hospital discharge and birth/death records with case files in the California Cancer Registry (CCR). The effect of timing of cancer diagnosis on clinical outcomes was studied by dividing the cases into three groups as follows: "prenatal" for cancer diagnosis within 9 months before delivery, "at delivery" for cancer diagnosis during delivery hospitalization, and "post partum" for cancer diagnosis within 12 months after delivery. Computerized records for 4,846,505 obstetric patients and 4,906,920 newborn infants comprising the linked vital statistics birth/patient discharge database (VS/PDD) were used to identity-match cases within the CCR case files. Cases of malignant disease were categorized into 22 anatomic or histologic subgroups. Perinatal clinical outcomes including preterm delivery, prolonged neonatal hospital stay, stillbirth, neonatal death, frequency of first trimester prenatal care, and cesarean delivery were analyzed by use of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes from the VS/PDD. Clinical cancer outcomes including cancer stage and vital status on follow-up were drawn from CCR records. Statistical comparisons for trends were performed with the Cochran-Armitage test, outcomes comparisons with the Fisher exact test, and survival comparisons were performed with the Cox proportional hazard model.ResultsAmong 4,846,505 obstetric deliveries, 4,539 cases of invasive malignancy were identified for an observed occurrence rate of 0.94 per 1000 births. Sixty-four percent of the cases occurred post partum; cancers of the breast, thyroid, cervix, along with malignant melanoma, and Hodgkin's disease accounted for 64% of the cases. The timing of cancer diagnosis affected clinical outcomes: for all cancer cases as a group, the most favorable perinatal and cancer outcomes occurred in women whose cancer diagnosis was made 6 to 9 months before delivery (6% of cases). The most unfavorable perinatal and cancer outcomes were associated with cancer diagnosis made 0 to 3 months before delivery (14% of cases). For women whose cancer was diagnosed post partum, perinatal outcomes were minimally affected by the presumed existence of occult cancer at the time of obstetric delivery.ConclusionThe use of computer-linkage to the CCR files enhanced identification of cases of maternal malignancy associated with obstetric delivery. Cancer diagnosis was associated with approximately 1 in 1000 deliveries. Most cases were diagnosed after delivery and were comprised predominantly of cancers of the breast, thyroid, cervix, malignant melanoma, and Hodgkin's disease. A small group of women (approximately 1 per 5000 deliveries) are seen within a few months before delivery or at delivery with malignant disease, many of whom have rapidly progressing disease and may require high-risk perinatal and oncology services.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.