-
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol · Apr 2014
Bronchoscopic training and practice in australia and New Zealand is inconsistent with published society guidelines.
- Eli J Dabscheck, Mark Hew, Louis Irving, and Daniel Steinfort.
- *Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Prahran †Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria.
- J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 Apr 1; 21 (2): 117-22.
BackgroundThe Australasian practice and training in bronchoscopy has not previously been reported and procedure volumes among Australasian respiratory consultants and trainees are unknown. We surveyed the current practice of flexible bronchoscopy in Australasia and determined adherence to published recommendations.MethodsAdult physician and trainee members of the Thoracic Society of Australia New Zealand (TSANZ) were e-mailed a web-link to an online survey. Survey responses were benchmarked against TSANZ recommendations.ResultsThe response rate was 42% overall and 78% among trainees. Forty-nine percent of consultants performed less than the recommended 50 procedures per year. Sixty percent of trainees were unlikely to achieve the recommended 200 supervised bronchoscopies during training. Less than 20% of trainees received adequate training in advanced bronchoscopic techniques such as transbronchial lymph node aspiration. The majority of physicians performing such advanced techniques were not performing sufficient numbers to satisfy published recommendations.ConclusionsA large proportion of Australasian bronchoscopists do not meet "numbers-based" recommendations. This empirical data support the 2012 TSANZ interventional guidelines' call to move beyond procedural volume as the sole determinant of technical competence. There is an urgent need to explore alternative means of developing and defining bronchoscopic proficiency.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.