• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Jan 1998

    Comparative Study

    Effects of nail rigidity on fracture healing. Strength and mineralisation in rat femoral bone.

    • S E Utvåg and O Reikerås.
    • Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital, Tromsoe, Norway. Bentem@rito.no
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998 Jan 1; 118 (1-2): 7-13.

    AbstractThe present study was undertaken to assess the effects of the rigidity of nails on the healing of fractures as evaluated by mechanical strength and rate of bone mineralisation. Ten rats supplied biomechanical data at the start of the experiment and another 100 rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups. In 20 rats no intervention was performed, and they served as a reference group of normal values. Thus, 80 rats underwent a standardised partial osteotomy in the left femur diaphysis prior to manual fracture, reaming and intramedullary nailing. One group received rigid steel nails (group 1) and another, cannulated steel nails (group 2). Group 3 received semi-rigid titanium nails and group 4, soft polyethylene nails. Ten rats in each group were evaluated at 6 and 12 weeks after fracture, and radiographs and callus diameter measurements were performed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the bones was performed, and the degree of mineralisation in the callus segment, distal diaphysis and total femur was calculated by the scanner. Subsequently, the bones were tested mechanically by a three-point bending test in a Mini Bionix (MTS) testing system. Radiographs revealed clearly visible fractures at 6 weeks in the intervention groups. At 12 weeks there were no signs of bridging callus in group 4, while the other groups presented scarcely visible osteotomies. The callus area in group 4 was significantly larger at both 6 and 12 weeks than in groups 1-3. In these groups there was a significant decrease in callus area between 6 and 12 weeks. Both maximum bending load, bending rigidity and fracture energy increased significantly in groups 1-3 between 6 and 12 weeks, while bending load and fracture energy increased in group 4. At 6 weeks no significant differences were detected between groups 1-3 in mechanical strength. Group 4 had a significantly reduced maximum bending load and fracture energy at 6 and 12 weeks as well as bending rigidity at 12 weeks. At 12 weeks group 3 had a significantly increased maximum bending load and fracture energy compared with groups 1 and 2. Bone mineral count (BMC) in the callus region in group 4 was significantly reduced at both 6 and 12 weeks. BMC in the callus showed no significant differences between groups 1-3, either at 6 or at 12 weeks. BMC in the distal diaphysis was significantly reduced in groups 1 and 4 compared with group 2 at 12 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the callus region revealed no significant differences between groups 1-3 at 6 weeks, while at 12 weeks BMD was higher in group 3 than in group 1. BMD in the callus region and total femur in group 4 was significantly reduced at 6 weeks. This study demonstrates that diaphyseal fractures treated with titanium nails with a bending rigidity similar to the intact femur have a higher maximum bending load and fracture energy at 12 weeks than both rigidly or softly nailed fractures. BMD in the callus region was also highest after titanium nailing at 12 weeks. BMD in the distal diaphysis and total femur indicates that the degree of stiffness of the nails have little influence on total bone mineralisation at 12 weeks.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…