• JAMA · Sep 1987

    Comparative Study

    Efficiency of intensive care. A comparative analysis of eight pediatric intensive care units.

    • M M Pollack, P R Getson, U E Ruttimann, C M Steinhart, R K Kanter, R W Katz, A R Zucker, N L Glass, W A Spohn, and B P Fuhrman.
    • JAMA. 1987 Sep 18; 258 (11): 1481-6.

    AbstractTo calculate overall pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) efficiency rates, 1668 patients representing 6962 patient-days were studied in eight PICUs. The contributions to inefficiency by two patient groups--low-risk monitored patients and potential early-discharge patients--were quantified using measures of daily mortality risk and therapeutic assessments. Low-risk monitored patients never received a unique PICU therapy and had daily mortality risks less than 1%. Potential early-discharge patients were similar to the low-risk monitored patients except that their unnecessary PICU use came only on their last consecutive day(s) of PICU stay. Efficiency ratings ranged from 0.894 to 0.547 in the eight PICUs. Low-risk monitored patients constituted from 16% to 58% of the PICU patient populations and used from 5.4% to 34.5% of the total days of care. Potential early-discharge patients constituted from 12% to 29% of the populations and the potential early-discharge days of care ranged from 5.1% to 17.2% of the total days of care. These results indicate that large disparity exists in efficiency among PICUs. Efficiency rates of greater than 0.80 seem to be a reasonable goal.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…