• Eur. J. Pharmacol. · Aug 2013

    Comparative Study

    Peripheral antinociceptive efficacy and potency of a novel opioid compound 14-O-MeM6SU in comparison to known peptide and non-peptide opioid agonists in a rat model of inflammatory pain.

    • Baled I Khalefa, Shaaban A Mousa, Mohammed Shaqura, Erzsébet Lackó, Sándor Hosztafi, Pál Riba, Michael Schäfer, Péter Ferdinandy, Susanna Fürst, and Mahmoud Al-Khrasani.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charite Mitte, Augustnburgerplatz 113353 Berlin, Germany.
    • Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013 Aug 5; 713 (1-3): 54-7.

    AbstractThis study compared the peripheral analgesic effects of a novel opioid agonist 14-O-methylmorphine-6-O-sulfate (14-O-MeM6SU), to that of non-peptide (morphine, fentanyl) and peptide opioid agonists (Met-enkephalin; met-ENK and β-endorphin; β-END) in a model of localized inflammatory pain evoked by intraplantar (i.pl.) Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA). Nociceptive responses to local opioid agonists were measured by pressure paw-withdrawal procedures. In addition, the antinociceptive efficacy and potency of these test compounds in vivo was compared to that in vitro using the rat vas deferens (RVD) bioassay. Intraplantar 14-O-MeM6SU (0.32-2.53 nmol/rat), morphine (14.95-112.15 nmol/rat), fentanyl (0.19-2.36 nmol/rat), met-ENK (0.10-10 nmol/rat) and β-END (0.77-5.00 nmol/rat) dose dependently increased paw pressure thresholds exclusively in inflamed hindpaws. At higher doses analgesic effects were also seen in noninflamed paws for 14-O-MeM6SU, morphine and fentanyl but not for met-ENK or β-END. The maximal possible local analgesic effect (%) measured in inflamed paws was 50.6 ± 2.7, 18.23 ± 1.78, 37.44 ± 2.17, 36.00 ± 1.43, and 40.69 ± 0.91 for 14-O-MeM6SU, morphine, fentanyl, met-ENK and β-END, respectively. Interestingly, i.pl. administered opioid peptides met-ENK and β-END displayed a peripheral analgesic ceiling effect. This local antinociception was antagonized by co-administered opioid antagonist naloxone-methiodide (NAL-M). Similar to the analgesic testing, the RVD showed the following efficacy order of the test compounds: 14-O-MeM6SU>β-END>fentanyl>met-ENK≫morphine. Taken together, 14-O-MeM6SU was more potent than morphine, fentanyl and met-ENK and β-END and displayed superiority in the maximum antinociceptive effects. The superiority of local antinociceptive effects of 14-O-MeM6SU might be due to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic factors.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…