• Marietta Garmer and Dietrich Grönemeyer.
• Grönemeyer Institut für Mikrotherapie, Bochum, Germany. garmer@microtherapy.de
• Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Aug 1; 22 (4): 153-69.

AbstractMagnetic resonance (MR)-guided interventions of large and small joints are feasible and safe procedures offering several advantages compared with standard guiding techniques. Nevertheless, MR-guided interventions are not routinely performed in daily practice apart from a few centers. Accurate injections are crucial for clinical outcome in diagnostic arthrography as well as therapeutic joint injections. In particular, palpatory joint puncture was shown to be inaccurate or uncertain in a substantial percentage of injections of the shoulder, the hip, and the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging offers respective merits of a cross-sectional technique with high soft-tissue contrast. Exact depiction of structures, which should be preserved, such as the labrum, should be aimed for. Areas with complex anatomy can be approached by adapting the right imaging plane(s) because of multiplanar capacity. Lack of ionizing radiation for patients is of growing interest particularly in young patients with repeated interventions. Magnetic resonance guidance alone allows an "all-in-one" MR arthrography combining precise targeting with high-field-strength imaging. Modern short-bore and open-bore high-field-strength systems offer a good comfort for patients as well as clinicians and enhance patient positioning options such as supine or prone position. Thus, a tailored approach such as a posterior technique for suspected anterior lesions in shoulder MR arthrography is possible.In this article, we describe the advantages and limitations of MR guidance in joint interventions with focus on shoulder and hip interventions. We review the requirements for needle material and MR sequences, discuss several different techniques developed to date, and present current results in clinical outcome.

15 keywords...

hide…