• J. Pediatr. Surg. · Nov 2007

    Review

    Fetal and neonatal hepatic tumors.

    • Hart Isaacs.
    • Department of Pathology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. isaacs@ucsd.edu.
    • J. Pediatr. Surg. 2007 Nov 1; 42 (11): 1797-803.

    Background/PurposeAlthough hepatic tumors are uncommon in the perinatal period they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in affected patients. The purpose of this review is to focus on the fetus and neonate in an attempt to determine the various ways liver tumors differ clinically and pathologically from those found in the older child and adult and to show that certain types of tumors have a better prognosis than others.MethodsThe author conducted a retrospective review of perinatal hepatic tumors reported in the literature and of patients treated and followed up at Children's Hospital San Diego and Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Only fetuses and infants younger than 2 months with adequate clinical and pathologic data ere accepted for review. The period of patient accrual was from 1970 to 2005. Length of follow-up varied from 1 week to more than 5 years. Elevated alpha-fetoprotein level was defined as one significantly higher than that of the reporting institution's normal level for age group; laboratory values for this protein vary from one institution to the next and therefore it was not possible to assign one figure as a standard reference number. Discussion of the differential diagnosis and pathologic findings of hepatic tumors in the fetus and neonate are described elsewhere and will not be discussed here in detail (Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1978;4:217; Weinberg AG, Finegold MJ. Primary hepatic tumors in childhood. In: Finegold M, editor. Pathology of neoplasia in children and adolescents. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1986; Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:693; Pediatr Pathol 1983;1:245; Arch Surg 1990;125:598; Semin Neonatol 2003;8:403; Pediatr Pathol 1985;3:165; Isaacs H Jr. Liver tumors. In: Isaacs H Jr, editor. Tumors of the fetus and newborn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1997; Isaacs H Jr. Liver tumors. In: Isaacs H Jr, editor. Tumors of the fetus and infant: an atlas. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2002).ResultsOne hundred ninety-four fetuses and neonates presented with hepatic tumors diagnosed prenatally (n = 56) and in the neonatal period (n = 138). The study consisted of 3 main tumors: hemangioma (117 cases, 60.3%), mesenchymal hamartoma (45 cases, 23.2%), and hepatoblastoma (32 cases, 16.5%). The most common initial finding was a mass found either by antenatal sonography or by physical examination during the neonatal period. Overall, hydramnios was next followed by fetal hydrops, respiratory distress, and congestive heart failure, which were often related to the cause of death. Half of the fetuses and neonates with hepatoblastoma had abnormally elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels compared with 16 (14%) of 117 of those with hemangioma and 1 neonate with mesenchymal hamartoma. There were 76 (65%) examples of solitary (unifocal) hemangiomas and 41 (35%) of multifocal (which included the entity diffuse hemangiomatosis) with 86% and 71% survival rates, respectively. Of 45 patients with mesenchymal hamartoma, of the 29 (64%) who had surgical resections, 23 (79%) survived. Patients with hepatoblastoma had the worst outcome of the group, for only 8 (25%) of 32 were alive. Half of patients with either stage 1 or 3 hepatoblastoma died; no patient with stage 4 survived. There was some relationship between histologic type and prognosis. For example, half of the patients with the pure fetal hepatoblastoma histology survived compared with those with fetal and embryonal histology where 30% survived. Fifteen of 32 hepatoblastoma patients received surgical resection with or without chemotherapy, resulting in 7 (47%) of 15 cures. The 56 fetuses and 138 neonates with hepatic tumors (hemangioma, mesenchymal hamartoma, and hepatoblastoma) had survival rates of 75%, 64%, and 25%, respectively. The overall survival of the entire group consisting of 194 tumors was 125 or 64%.ConclusionsThe study shows that clinical findings in fetuses and neonates with hepatic tumors are less well defined than in older children. Survival rates are much lower as well. When the clinical course is complicated by associated conditions such as stillbirth, fetal hydrops, congestive heart failure, severe anemia, or thrombocytopenia, the mortality rate is much greater. If the patient is mature enough and in a clinical condition where he or she can be operated on, survival figures approach those of the older child. Some hepatic tumors have a better prognosis than others. Neonates with focal (solitary) hepatic hemangiomas have the best outcome and fetuses with hepatoblastoma the worst. Although infantile hemangioma undergoes spontaneous regression, it may be life threatening when congestive heart failure and/or consumptive coagulopathy occur. Mesenchymal hamartoma is a benign lesion best treated by surgical resection, which usually results in cure. However, there are fatal complications associated with this tumor, ie, fetal hydrops, respiratory distress, and circulatory problems owing to a large space occupying abdominal lesion and sometimes stillbirth, all contributing to the death rate. Hepatoblastoma, the major malignancy of the fetus and neonate, is treated primarily by surgical resection. Pre- or postoperative chemotherapy is reserved for those patients with unresectable tumors or metastatic disease. The survival rate is much lower than that reported by multigroup prospective trials. Patients die from the mass effect caused by the tumor, which lead to abdominal distension, vascular compromise, anemia, hydrops, respiratory distress, and stillbirth. Metastases to the abdominal cavity, lungs, and placenta are other causes of death. Because of the danger of labor-induced rupture of the tumor and potentially fatal intraabdominal hemorrhage, cesarean delivery is recommended when a hepatic tumor is found on prenatal ultrasound.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…