-
- K D Tetsworth, A Y Borshch, C E Dlaska, and E Hohmann.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
- Injury. 2016 Aug 1; 47 (8): 1770-6.
IntroductionThe architecture of joints almost certainly influences the nature of intra-articular fractures, and the concavity is much more likely to fail than the associated convexity. However, local differences in periarticular bone density potentially also plays a critical role. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there was any difference in periarticular bone density in intra-articular fractures between the two opposing joint surfaces, comparing the convexity to the concavity.Materials And MethodsWe retrospectively identified a series of 1003 intra-articular fractures of the hip, knee, and ankle; 129 of these patients had previously undergone CT scanning during their routine clinical assessment. Periarticular bone density was assessed using Hounsfield Units (HU) as a measure of the composite density of the adjacent bone. Bone density was compared between the opposite sides of each joint, to determine if a relationship exists between local bone density and the risk of articular surface fracture.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference in density between the two opposing surfaces, with the convexity 19% more dense than the concavity (p=0.0001). The knee exhibited the largest difference (55%), followed by the hip (18%); in the ankle, an inverse relationship was observed, and the concave surface was paradoxically denser (5%). There was no significant difference between those cases where the concavity failed in isolation compared to those where the convexity also failed (p=0.28).ConclusionWhen the results were pooled for all three joints, there was a statistically significant higher local bone density demonstrated on the convex side of an intra-articular fracture. However, while this relationship was clearly exhibited in the knee, this was less evident in the other two joints; in the ankle the reverse was true, and the local bone adjacent to the concavity was found to have greater density. This suggests local bone density plays only a minor role in determining the nature of intra-articular fractures.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.