• Spine · Sep 1995

    Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine.

    • F J Schwab, D G Nazarian, F Mahmud, and C B Michelsen.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
    • Spine. 1995 Sep 15; 20 (18): 2023-8.

    Study DesignThis study retrospectively, reviewed the effects of pedicle screw fixation on lumbosacral fusion for degenerative conditions. The records and radiographs of a group of patients treated by wide decompression and fusion of the lumbosacral spine and by one surgeon were studied. Two treatment groups were identified by fusion technique; one group received autologous bone graft only, and second group was treated by autologous bone grafting supplemented with pedicle screw fixation.ObjectivesThe two study groups were compared to determine the effects of pedicle screw fixation on lumbosacral fusion for degenerative conditions after wide decompression.Summary Of Background DataThe reported success rate of lumbar and lumbosacral fusion in the literature is variable. Although several studies have reported high fusion rates with internal fixation, few controlled studies have been published. A critical review of isolated lumbosacral fusions (for degenerative conditions) and the effects of instrumentation is necessary to determine the effectiveness and complications associated with pedicle screw systems in this setting.MethodsThis study reviewed 215 consecutive patients operated on from 1987 to 1992 for degenerative conditions of the lumbosacral spine. Group 1 included 126 patients who underwent autogenous posterolateral bone graft after decompression. Group 2 included 89 patients treated with Edwards instrumentation and autogenous bone graft. Fusion status was determined via radiographs. Clinical results were based on pain relief after a minimum 2-year follow-up period.ResultsIn Group 1, an overall fusion rate of 65% was obtained. Clinically, 56% had good or excellent results. Complications included pseudarthroses (35%), dural tears (3.2%), and infection (2.4%). In Group 2, a fusion rate of 91% was achieved. In this group, 89% had a good or excellent clinical result. Complications included pseudarthroses (9%), dural tears (2.2%), and infection (2.2%).ConclusionsUse of pedicle screw and rod fixation with the Edwards system led to significantly improved results in lumbosacral fusions over autogenous bone graft alone, with a lower complication rate. The use of spinal is a valuable adjunct to achieve lumbosacral fusion in patients who have undergone decompressive surgery for the spine.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.