-
Int J Colorectal Dis · Jul 1993
Comparative StudyHow reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone?
- V F Eckardt and G Kanzler.
- Gastroenterologisches Institut Wiesbaden, Germany.
- Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993 Jul 1; 8 (2): 95-7.
AbstractThis study investigates whether digital examination of the anal canal can differentiate reliably between competent and incompetent sphincters. Digital examinations were performed by an experienced proctologist who was blinded with regard to the patient's history as well as manometric and endoscopic findings. There was poor correlation between manometric findings and digital assessment of anal sphincter tone. The sensitivity of digital examination for diagnosing incompetent sphincters ranged from 63% to 84%, whereas specificity was calculated as only 57%. It is concluded that even the experienced examiner needs to use more sophisticated methods than digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter competence.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..