• Ann Emerg Med · Jan 1988

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Lack of efficacy of 'weighted' radiographs in diagnosing acute acromioclavicular separation.

    • P J Bossart, S M Joyce, B J Manaster, and S M Packer.
    • Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Jan 1; 17 (1): 20-4.

    AbstractThe efficacy of "weighted" films in diagnosing grade 3 acromioclavicular (AC) sprains not evident on plain (unweighted) films was evaluated. Eighty-three pairs of radiographs, taken with and without weights, of patients with suspected AC injury were studied. The films were read in a randomized and blinded manner by a staff radiologist. Criteria for classifying AC injuries were: grade 1, less than 3 mm (or less than 50%) difference between the AC widths with a normal coracoclavicular (CC) distance; grade 2, greater than or equal to 3 mm (or greater than or equal to 50%) difference between the AC widths with a normal CC distance; and grade 3, greater than or equal to 5 mm (or greater than or equal to 50%) difference in CC distance. In only three cases (4%) did weights cause the injured CC distance to increase and thereby unmask a grade 3 injury not evident on plain films. Further evidence that weights may not reliably elucidate the degree of AC joint injury is suggested by the fact that in several cases the weights actually caused the injured and uninjured CC distance to decrease. We conclude that the use of weighted radiographs lacks efficacy in unmasking grade 3 AC sprains on radiograph and we recommend that routine use of this technique be abandoned.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…