• F Kandziora, K J Schnake, C K Klostermann, and N P Haas.
• Wirbelsäulenzentrum im Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. frank.kandziora@charite.de
• Unfallchirurg. 2004 May 1; 107 (5): 354-71.

AbstractAutografts and allogeneous bone grafts as well as cages are used for the reconstruction of the anterior column after corpectomy. Recently, expandable cages for vertebral body replacement have been developed. Based on our own experience, the purpose of this study was to summarize the available biomechanical and clinical data of expandable corpectomy cages and to compare it with established fixation techniques. If used correctly, expandable cages offer several surgical advantages in comparison to non-expandable cages. However there were no significant differences between the biomechanical properties of expandable and non-expandable cages. Additionally, design variations of expandable corpectomy cages did not show any significant impact on the biomechanical stability. Currently available mid-term clinical and radiological data on the treatment of fractures, metastasis and infection of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine demonstrated no significant difference between expandable and non-expandable cages. However, the increased stress-shielding effect of expandable cages compared to non-expandable cages might result in a deterioration of the long-term clinical outcome.

17 keywords...

hide…