-
Comparative Study
Predicting mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: The APACHE II score versus the new IBMP-10 score.
- Mehdi Mirsaeidi, Paula Peyrani, Julio A Ramirez, and Improving Medicine through Pathway Assessment of Critical Therapy of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (IMPACT-HAP) Investigators.
- Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
- Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009 Jul 1; 49 (1): 72-7.
BackgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the leading cause of mortality associated with nosocomial infection. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score at the time of diagnosis of VAP is considered the best scoring system to predict mortality in patients with VAP. The objective of this study was to develop a simple score to predict mortality in patients with VAP and to compare its results with those for the APACHE II scoring system.MethodsThe new score was developed by performing a univariate analysis of data collected from 178 patients with VAP. The mortality prediction ability of the new score was compared with the APACHE II score on the basis of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.ResultsThe IBMP-10 score assigned 1 point to each of the following variables: (1) the presence of immunodeficiency; (2) blood pressure <90 mm Hg (systolic) or <60 mm Hg (diastolic); (3) multilobar infiltrates noted on a chest radiograph; (4) platelet count, <100,000/mm(3); and (5) duration of hospitalization before the onset of VAP of >10 days. The area under the curve was 0.743 for the APACHE II score and 0.824 for the IBMP-10 score (P < .001).ConclusionsThis preliminary work indicates that a 5-point score, the IBMP-10, is comparable to the APACHE II score in its ability to predict mortality in patients with VAP. If future studies validate the IBMP-10 score, physicians may be have a simple tool to evaluate the disease severity and to predict outcomes in patients with VAP.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.