• J Bone Joint Surg Am · Nov 2001

    Percutaneous pinning of the proximal part of the humerus. An anatomic study.

    • D J Rowles and J E McGrory.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia 23708-3714, USA.
    • J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Nov 1; 83-A (11): 1695-9.

    BackgroundClosed reduction and percutaneous pinning of unstable proximal humeral fractures is a well-described technique with some theoretical advantages over open techniques. To our knowledge, the risk of injury to neurovascular structures from percutaneous pinning of the proximal part of the humerus has not been studied. We sought to quantify this risk using a cadaveric model.MethodsIn ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders, the intact proximal part of the humerus was pinned under fluoroscopic guidance with use of an identical published technique. A total of five 2.5-mm terminally threaded AO pins, including two lateral, one anterior, and two greater tuberosity pins, were used in each shoulder. The specimens were then dissected to determine the distance of each pin from adjacent neurovascular structures as well as key anatomic relationships.ResultsThe proximal lateral pins were located at a mean distance of 3 mm from the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. Four of the twenty lateral pins were noted to penetrate the articular cartilage of the humeral head. The anterior pins were located at a mean distance of 2 mm from the tendon of the long head of the biceps (perforating the tendon in three specimens) and of 11 mm from the cephalic vein (perforating the vein in one specimen). The proximal tuberosity pins were located at a mean distance of 6 and 7 mm from the axillary nerve and the posterior humeral circumflex artery (tenting the structures in two specimens with internal rotation), respectively. These pins moved away from the nerve with external rotation of the humerus.ConclusionsThe technique used in this study may be associated with a risk of injury to important anatomic structures about the shoulder. Lateral pins should be distal enough to avoid injury to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve, and multiple fluoroscopic views should be obtained to avoid penetration of the humeral head cartilage. There may be a risk of injury to the cephalic vein, the biceps tendon, and the musculocutaneous nerve with use of anterior pins, and these pins should be employed with caution. Greater tuberosity pins should be placed with the arm in external rotation, should be aimed for a point 20 mm from the inferior aspect of the humeral head, and should not overpenetrate the cortex.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…