• Resuscitation · Oct 1996

    Comparative Study

    Comparative assessment of shockable ECG rhythm detection algorithms in automated external defibrillators.

    • A C Clifford.
    • Institute for Biomedical Equipment Evaluation and Services, Sheffield, UK.
    • Resuscitation. 1996 Oct 1; 32 (3): 217-25.

    AbstractThe sensitivity and specificity to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), classified as requiring immediate DC shock, of four automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and three advisory defibrillators were assessed using the Department of Health Arrhythmia library. This library collected mostly from patients in hospital, includes a wide variety of ECG rhythms including many with additional noise and interference artefact. The library comprised 278 16-s rhythms, 59 of which were VF, 36 were VT requiring cardioversion and 183 were deemed non-shockable. Non-shockable rhythms included asystole, pacing, slow VT, idioventricular rhythms, sinus and atrial based rhythms, some of which contained ventricular ectopic activity of differing grades. For the AEDs, a positive result (indicating detection of a shockable rhythm) was recorded if charging started or was able to be started at any time during the 16 s of rhythm output and energy subsequently available for discharge. For the advisory defibrillators, a positive result was recorded if a 'shock advised' alert was issued at any time during output of the rhythm. The AEDs exhibited sensitivities to VF in the range 81-94%, and to VF plus shockable VT 64-73%, or 72-83% depending whether VT > 150 beats/min or > 180 beats/min is considered to be shockable. The specificities recorded were in the range 90-94% and 86-92%, respectively. All but one of the advisory defibrillators performed similarly. Excluding the artefact rhythms, specificities in the range 79-91% were obtained. All figures stated are at the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.