-
- Randal Leung and Robert G Berkowitz.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
- Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn. 2005 Oct 1; 114 (10): 743-8.
ObjectivesWe investigated the long-term outcome of pediatric tracheostomy to identify predictive factors of early decannulation.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of 75 patients less than 20 years of age who underwent tracheostomy between 1998 and 2003 during their admission in a tertiary pediatric institution. Complete information was available on 65 patients.ResultsThere were 41 male patients and 24 female patients (median age, 7 months). The indications for tracheostomy were an obstructed airway in 36 patients, prolonged mechanical ventilation in 15, and tracheobronchial toilet or aspiration risk in 14. Twelve patients died, and 30 of the 53 survivors were decannulated (median cannulation time, 123.5 days). Additional airway procedures were required for decannulation in those with obstructed airways. Patients who had tracheostomy performed for tracheobronchial toilet had a significantly shorter cannulation time than those with the other two indications (log-rank test, chi2(2) = 47.11; p < .00001). Patient diagnosis was also a significant predictor of cannulation time (log-rank test, chi2(2) = 66.05; p < .00001). Tracheobronchial toilet as a tracheostomy indication and both trauma and neurologic conditions as admission diagnoses were statistically significant independent variables that predicted earlier decannulation on multivariate analysis. Analysis of other group variables--age, sex, and tracheostomy insertion technique--did not reveal any significant difference in cannulation times.ConclusionsTracheostomy indication and patient diagnosis are significant variables that predict early decannulation in pediatric patients in whom tracheostomy is required. Other variables were not shown to be significant independent predictors.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.